Buzz Paths

Yesterday U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton suspended the law’s requirement that cops check a person’s immigration status during traffic stops, detentions and arrests. Read the ENTIRE COURT ORDER HERE

She also put a hold on the requirement that legal immigrants carry their citizenship papers at all times or face penalties and the provision making it illegal for an undocumented immigrant to have a job.

In her ruling, Bolton said the law would put an unfair burden on legal immigrants.

Unfair burden on illegals? Give me a break! It puts an unfair burden on the State of Arizona and all of it’s LEGAL citizens. But this comes as no surprise since Judge Susie is a Bubba Clinton appointee.

Of Barak Hussein Obama’s interference in Arizona’s rightful attempt to protect itself, he and the rest of today’s Washington liberal ilk would be wise to take heed of the words of Senator Robert A. Taft of Ohio in 1958. Yes, that’s 1958! How these words resonate today: “I don’t believe you can have freedom in a country the size of the United States unless you have freedom of state and local communities to decide their own affairs. This country is so tremendous that no one sitting in Washington is responsive to local public opinion and consequently the regulations he attempts to make amount to tyranny in many communities where they are different from what the people want.” Taken from the 1962 book – ‘Barry Goldwater – Mr. Conservative
‘ a great book not coincidentally about Senator Barry Goldwater of, yes, Arizona. 1962! Yes, even then the conservative geniuses like Goldwater and Taft knew!

Twenty other states are considering enacting versions of the Arizona law. Now why is that? Maybe because Barry and da Boyz are doing NOTHING to protect us or enforcing the U.S. Immigration Laws?

We are asking you to bombard the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona with your comments regarding Judge Susie’s decision. Please go to the United States District Court of Arizona and let them know what you think!

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/azd/guestbook.nsf/comment

I was recently in a Lowe’s Home Center looking for some plumbing fixtures for a do it yourself project I was working on. As I strolled the aisles looking for the part I needed I ran into a Russian couple who were standing in the aisle talking to one another in broken English. There was no one else around except me so there really wasn’t any reason why they couldn’t speak in their native tongue. I stopped and told them that I thought it was great that they were speaking English. The gentleman told me that he and his wife worked very hard at learning English so they could become citizens. They had another six months or so before they would become citizens and were very proud of that.

I continued on my quest for the part I was looking for and turned the corner into another aisle. I ran into a family of Mexicans and a salesman. The family was jabbering away VERY loudly in Spanish. The salesman looked like a deer caught in the headlights and other customers were disgusted by the rude behavior of this group. As I passed them I turned and said “English”. The what I am assuming was the father, looked at me and in very bad English told me “Fuck you man, learn Spanish”. Needless to say I went ballistic on this guy. The store manager came out and got into the fray. I told him what was going on, the saleman explained what was going on and how they were being disruptive and rude, and guess what? I was asked to leave!

So off I went never to again set foot in a Lowe’s.

Now, here’s my real problem. Not just with Lowe’s but with just about every large retail chain. THey all have signage in Spanish and English. What about all the other languages? I was taught that America was “the melting pot” . So if you are going to pander to one ethnic group, why not include ALL of them.

We have a law on the books called the The Immigration and Nationality Act, or INA, was created in 1952 and ammended in 1986. In it it states:INA: ACT 312 – REQUIREMENTS AS TO UNDERSTANDING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, HISTORY, PRINCIPLES, AND FORM OF GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Sec. 312. [8 U.S.C. 1423]

(a) No person except as otherwise provided in this title shall hereafter be naturalized as a citizen of the United States upon his own application who cannot demonstrate-

(1) an understanding of the English language, including an ability to read, write, and speak words in ordinary usage in the English language: Provided, That the requirements of this paragraph relating to ability to read and write shall be met if the applicant can read or write simple words and phrases to the end that a reasonable test of his literacy shall be made and that no extraordinary or unreasonable conditions shall be imposed upon the applicant; and

(2) a knowledge and understanding of the fundamentals of the history, and of the principles and form of government, of the United States.

(b) (1) The requirements of subsection (a) shall not apply to any person who is unable because of physical or developmental disability or mental impairment to comply therewith.

(2) The requirement of subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to any person who, on the date of the filing of the person’s application for naturalization as provided in section 334 , either-

(A) is over fifty years of age and has been living in the United States for periods totaling at least twenty years subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence, or

(B) is over fifty-five years of age and has been living in the United States for periods totaling at least fifteen years subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence.

(3) The Attorney General, pursuant to regulations, shall provide for special consideration, as determined by the Attorney General, concerning the requirement of subsection (a)(2) with respect to any person who, on the date of the filing of the person’s application for naturalization as provided in section 334 , is over sixty-five years of age and has been living in the United States for periods totaling at least twenty years subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence.

Now, if that’s the case, why are all these stores putting signage up in Spanish? Why is the Whitehouse website in English and Spanish? How about we just have it in English?

In my opinion, not having translations in all languages is a form of discrimination. So where’s the ACLU on this one?

Here’s my beef with our wonderful Congress. We already have laws on the books called the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 which you should read if you haven’t done so.

Congress wants to work on immigration reform. Why? How about we just enforce the above laws which they passed 21 years ago? In the Bill it calls for very strict penalties for employers who hire illegals. “(f) Criminal Penalties and Injunctions for Pattern or Practice Violations.–

“(1) Criminal penalty.–Any person or entity which engages in a pattern or practice of violations of subsection (a)(1)(A) or (a)(2) shall be fined not more than $3,000 for each unauthorized alien with respect to whom such a violation occurs, imprisoned for not more than six months for the entire pattern or practice, or both, notwithstanding the provisions if any other Federal law relating to fine levels.”

Don’t you think that this just might make employers take a second look if the law was being enforced? The illegal alien invasion of this country would stop almost immediatley if they knew there was not a snowballs chance in Hell of getting work here. And the illegals that are already here would go back from whence they came.

Contact your representatives and let them know about the laws THEY passed 21 years ago.